Messianic Yeshiva

MISHNAH · AVOT · 4 OF 5

Community and careful judgment

Read Avot 2:4 on God’s will, belonging, judgment, clear speech and making time to learn.

About 25 minutes · No Hebrew needed · Try each question before opening its answer

In this lesson

Belong without assuming you know

How can we take responsibility without becoming certain that our own judgment is always right? The previous readings joined Torah learning, work and service, then warned about the interests behind powerful people’s welcome. This passage turns toward our own desires, our place among others and the limits of what we know.

Avot is a tractate, a named collection within the Mishnah, preserving teachings of our sages. Avot 2:4 means chapter 2, mishnah 4. This lesson follows the common numbering: it includes a teaching of Rabban Gamliel and then sayings introduced with “Hillel says.” The Hebrew edition linked below divides these into 2:4 and 2:5. The speakers’ names and opening words help us find the same text across editions.

Whose will comes first?

“He used to say” continues Rabban Gamliel’s teaching. Hashem, “the Name,” is our customary way to refer to God; “his will” here means God’s will.

הוא היה אומר, עשה רצונו כרצונך, כדי שיעשה רצונך כרצונו; בטל רצונך מפני רצונו, כדי שיבטל רצון אחרים מפני רצונך.

He used to say: Make his will like your will, so that he may make your will like his will. Set aside your will before his will, so that he may set aside the will of others before your will.

Avot 2:4, first teaching · Mechon Mamre 2:4
English rendering by Messianic Yeshiva; punctuation is editorial

The repeated word is ratzon, will or desire. First comes “make”: bring energy to what Hashem desires. Then comes “set aside”: a competing desire must yield. These are related but distinct movements. Willing service involves both wanting the good and relinquishing something that gets in its way.

Read the promised response together with that starting point. The passage begins by reshaping our desire around God’s will; it does not begin by making our preferences the measure of God’s service. Its language of divine response encourages trust, rather than supplying a way to control other people.

1. What changes between “make” and “set aside”?

“Make his will like your will” calls for willing commitment; “set aside your will before his will” addresses competing desires. Both place God’s will first, although one emphasizes embracing and the other yielding.

Read Hillel’s five cautions

הלל אומר, אל תפרוש מן הציבור, ואל תאמין בעצמך עד יום מותך, ואל תדון את חברך עד שתגיע למקומו, ואל תאמר דבר שאי אפשר לשמוע וסופו להישמע. ואל תאמר לכשאפנה אשנה, שמא לא תפנה.

Hillel says: Do not separate yourself from the community. Do not trust in yourself until the day of your death. Do not judge your companion until you reach that person’s place. Do not say something that cannot be heard but will ultimately be heard. Do not say, “When I am free, I will study,” for perhaps you will not become free.

Avot 2:4, Hillel’s teaching · Mechon Mamre 2:5
English rendering by Messianic Yeshiva; punctuation is editorial

Tzibbur means community or public. Hillel begins with belonging, then questions self-confidence, judgment of another, speech and postponement. Our shared life needs more than attendance: how we evaluate and address one another also matters. That connection is our reading of the arrangement, not an extra sentence in the Mishnah.

“Until the day of your death” makes the horizon lifelong. Good habits require continued attention; achievement does not put us beyond failure. “Until you reach that person’s place” then checks how quickly we pronounce on someone else. We can observe what happened without pretending to know every pressure under which it happened.

2. Name the five cautions without rereading the source.

Do not separate from the community; do not trust yourself as secure until death; do not judge a companion before reaching that person’s place; take care with speech that cannot be heard but eventually will be; do not postpone study until you are free. Return to the source to restore any missing clause.

3. Does caution about judging mean that a missed responsibility did not matter?

No. “Until you reach that person’s place” challenges the confidence of the judge. It does not erase the observed action. A careful response can name a missed responsibility while admitting uncertainty about its circumstances.

Make the difficult clause intelligible

What could “cannot be heard but will ultimately be heard” mean? A literal rendering preserves the puzzle. Rambam, Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon, is a later interpreter of the Mishnah. In his commentary, he explains this as a warning against words whose plain sense seems unreasonable and whose meaning becomes clear only through a strained, elaborate explanation. In this reading, the speaker should make the meaning accessible rather than leave the listener to rescue it later.

That is a named explanation of the source, not a replacement Hebrew text. It gives us a concrete reading task: ask what listeners can reasonably understand now. A teacher who says, “You will work out what I meant eventually,” has shifted the burden of clarity onto the learner.

4. Which is Mishnah, and which is commentary: “cannot be heard” or “avoid relying on elaborate later explanation”?

“Cannot be heard” renders the Mishnah’s wording. Avoiding reliance on elaborate later explanation paraphrases Rambam’s interpretation. Naming both lets us see how the commentator helps us understand a compressed saying.

Work through a shared responsibility

Worked example. In an invented study group, Leah misses her turn to prepare the reading. Daniel says, “She clearly does not care; I would never do that.” Begin with the evidence: the preparation was missed. His explanation of her motive and prediction about himself go beyond that evidence. Hillel’s cautions about judging and self-confidence address those two leaps separately. Daniel could ask what happened and arrange the next reading without deciding Leah’s character.

Now change the case. The group’s organizer gives newcomers an unexplained abbreviation and says they will understand eventually. Use Rambam’s reading to propose a repair. Then consider a member who continually postpones study until all responsibilities vanish. Hillel’s “perhaps” identifies an uncertain future, not a guaranteed future opportunity.

5. Repair the organizer’s instruction in one sentence.

“Avot 2:4 means chapter 2, mishnah 4 of tractate Avot; we will read its two speakers today.” This original example supplies the missing meaning now rather than expecting a newcomer to reconstruct it later.

6. How does “perhaps you will not become free” answer the postponement?

The proposed study depends on leisure that may never arrive. The saying exposes that dependency. Planning a modest, actual reading makes a beginning without pretending that work or communal duties disappear.

7. Does “do not separate” require agreement with everything a group does?

The clause calls us toward communal belonging. It does not say that every group decision is right. In this passage, belonging sits beside judgment, speech and responsibility before God; reducing it to automatic agreement loses those distinctions.

Return tomorrow

At your next session, recall the two speakers and three different objects of attention: God’s will, your own confidence and your companion’s circumstances. Reconstruct Hillel’s five cautions before looking. Then explain the difficult speech clause twice: first with the Mishnah’s words, then with Rambam’s explanation.

8. What would make your recall more than a list of slogans?

Give a distinction for each example: embracing versus yielding; an observed action versus an assumed motive; the source’s wording versus a commentator’s explanation; available time versus hoped-for leisure. Check those distinctions against the actual sentences.

Read in context

Continue with Learning that becomes action to bring these responsibilities into the learning room.